Can contractors in Libya limit or exclude their liability?

pexels-lorenz-k-575435782-17909242

Introduction

Contractors will always want to avoid assuming full liability for their performance. Since construction projects tend to exceed both time and budget, contractors try to minimise their risk of financial exposure by negotiating to limit or exclude their liability.

Libyan law is now settled, aligning with international standards in allowing contracts that limit parties’ liability and that may exclude most forms of liability in most cases. 

Limitation and Exclusion of Liability Under Libyan Law

The Libyan Civil Code (“LCC“) is the sole source of Libyan law addressing exclusion and limitation of liability. Special regulations applying to the oil and gas and construction industries, such as the Administrative Contracts Regulation and the National Oil Corporation Unified Contracting Policy, as well as the Libyan Commercial Code, do not address this issue. 

Tortious Liability

Under Libyan law, contracting parties cannot exclude tortious liability. However, they can include liability cap clauses in the contract. These clauses can limit the compensation amount that a party can recover for torts occurring ancillary to the contract performance (Article Article 220 (3) LCC).

Contractual Liability

The LCC explicitly allows parties the freedom of contract to generally exclude and/or limit contractual liability(Article 220 LCC), with certain exceptions. 

First, Libyan law prohibits excluding liability arising from a party’s own fraud or gross negligence, although such liability can be contractually limited (Article 220 LCC). However, parties can contractually exclude their own liability for losses arising from the fraud or gross negligence of persons that parties use to perform the contract, such as subcontractors. 

Fraud and gross negligence are not defined under Libyan laws. This gives judges the statutory authority to decide whether or not a particular action falls under “fraud and/or gross negligence”. Therefore, it is crucial to contractually define fraud and gross negligence to mitigate the risk of broad interpretation by judges. Such a definition would be contractually binding on the parties, as the parties are free to determine their own terms in a contract, provided that these terms do not violate mandatory rules under Libyan law (Article 147 (1) LCC).This ensures clarity and helps protect contractors by providing a contractual definition that might reduce ambiguity in legal proceedings.

Second, Article 650 LCC prohibits parties from contractually excluding or limiting defect liability. The contractor and engineer remain responsible for any defect that appears within a period of 10 years after delivery, and they cannot exclude or limit this responsibility contractually. Any contractual clause to the contrary is deemed invalid under Libyan law. 

Law 6 and subsequent changes

Libyan law’s position on the exclusion and/or limitation of contractual liability has changed in recent years. In 2016, the General National Congress (the Libyan legislator at that time) enacted a law (“Law 6“) amending several provisions in the LCC and thereby prohibiting contractual limitation or exclusion of liability (Law No 6 of 2016 regarding Amending the Libyan Civil Code) While some Libyan courts applied Law 6, others did not, creating confusion and legal uncertainty in the market. 

This confusion was resolved in 2020, when the Libyan House of Representatives (the General National Congress successor) enacted Law No. 1 of 2020, which annulled a list of laws issued by the General National Congress between 2014 and 2020, including Law 6. 

 

The View of Libyan Courts on Exclusion and Limitation of Liability

Libyan courts generally respect and enforce the agreements made by the parties in a contract. If there are exclusion or limitation of liability clauses, the courts will consider these clauses when making their decisions. To ensure the validity of these clauses, they must be drafted accurately and clearly. Ambiguities in the clauses may lead Libyan courts to interpret the clauses in ways that might not be in the parties’ intended interests. Therefore, we advise clients to carefully consider their position on liability and ensure that liability clauses clearly and accurately reflect clients’ intentions. 

However, bad faith in performing the contract, such as wilful misconduct or fraud, may lead the courts to invalidate exclusion and limitation of liability clauses. For example, if a party is found to have acted in bad faith, the court may decide that such clauses do not apply to protect the offending party from liability. The principal of good faith is integral to Libyan law, As contracts are required to be performed in a manner that is fair and honest (Article 148 LCC).

Some clients use international forms for EPC/Turnkey Projects, such as the International Federation of Consulting Engineers (“FIDIC“) Silver Second edition 2017 form. The FIDIC form includes template clauses for excluding and limiting contractor liabilities. These clauses can be adopted under Libyan law, provided such clauses align with local legal requirements. 

Conclusion 

While exclusion and limitation of liability clauses are recognised under Libyan law, their enforceability is conditional upon clarity, fairness, and compliance with statutory requirements. 

 

Nusaiba Alraes, Associate at Eltumi Partners, a law firm specialised in advising on Libyan and international energy and infrastructure matters nusaiba.alraes@eltumipartners.com

conarb

conarb

Leave a Reply

Get blog posts in your inbox

To keep up with the latest developments in Africa please subscribe to our Blog

Editorial
Our blog is managed under the guidance of Africa Construction Law Advisory Board who serve as editorial advisors. We welcome contributions from lawyers and non-lawyers.
General Editor
Reindorf Jodie
Reindorf Jodie

Associate, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, UAE

Regional Editors

Thandeka Nene (Southern Africa Region)

Thandeka Nene (Southern Africa Region)

Built Environmental Legal Specialist, Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA)

Camilla Fröhlich (Southern Africa Region)

Camilla Fröhlich (Southern Africa Region)

Senior Foreign Associate, Hogan Lovells, South Africa

Dr. Emilio Linde-Arias (Central Africa Region)

Dr. Emilio Linde-Arias (Central Africa Region)

Managing Engineer, Exponent, London, England, United Kingdom

Abiola Aderibigbe (Western Africa Region)

Abiola Aderibigbe (Western Africa Region)

Group Head of Legal & Commercial, BESA Group, London, England, United Kingdom

Elizabeth Ashun (Western Africa Region)

Elizabeth Ashun (Western Africa Region)

Partner, Bentsi-Enchill, Letsa & Ankomah, Accra, Ghana

Omonigho Oyoma Brown (Western Africa Region)

Omonigho Oyoma Brown (Western Africa Region)

Head, Contract Management Julius Berger Nigeria Plc, FCT Abuja, Nigeria

Feisal Okocha Mulama, ACIARB (Eastern Africa Region)

Feisal Okocha Mulama, ACIARB (Eastern Africa Region)

Group In-Legal Counsel, Lordship Africa, Kenya

Yvonne Getugi (Eastern Africa Region)

Yvonne Getugi (Eastern Africa Region)

Assistant Manager, Legal Services, National Construction Authority, Kenya.

Diogo Duarte de Campos (Lusophone Africa Region)

Diogo Duarte de Campos (Lusophone Africa Region)

Partner, PLMJ - Sociedade de Advogados, RL, Portugal

John Coghlan (FCIArb)

John Coghlan (FCIArb)

Principal C&E Legal Solutions

Should you wish to contribute to the ACL Blog, please send your article to aclblog@africaconstructionlaw.org and a member of our editorial team will get in touch with you. You can find our editorial guidelines here.
Recent Posts

Sign up for our Newsletter

Our leading industry blog keeps you up to speed on the latest practice and legal developments in the field of construction law across the African continent.